Josh Bell’s review of Harry Potter 6 movie

Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince.

When the book came out, I was more excited than I could ever remember being, apart from when Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released. I felt myself feeling the same feelings going into the movie, which was a first, since the other movies had never heralded that much expectation.

The fact is, this is an important tale to tell, no matter how slow the story may have been, because without it, the final installment is impossible, and unless done perfectly, that final installment would suffer. I’m afraid to say that the final installment will suffer greatly for what the Half Blood Prince has done, and contrary to what other reviewers have said, this film has been done poorly.

I’m going to assume you have read these books, for the movie follows much of the book, no matter how many necessary plot points are cut out, so if by any chance you have not read the book or do not want the movie spoiled, be warned that this review may very well contain a few spoilers. In a nutshell, Britain is being terrorized by death eaters (I’m afraid the trailer will show you the entirety of that scene) Harry is going back to school, Malfoy is plotting something, Dumbledore has acquired a mysterious ailment to his right hand, and an old ex retiree has returned to Hogwarts to teach, and has something Dumbledore and Harry desperately want.

The three main characters are still played by Daniel Radcliff, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, all of whom are getting rather old to convincingly play sixteen year old students of Hogwarts school of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Horace Slughorn is played exceedingly well, and Lavender Brown has been acted out spot on, with most of the audience laughs heading in her direction. As usual Alan Rickman does an almost perfect portrayal of the man we love to hate; Snape, and Maggie Smith does a wonderful job of Professor McGonagall.

The main problem with Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince is that the director; David Yates, focuses on entirely the wrong things, with Quidditch, teenage Romance, a very strange and unneeded attack on the Weasley house and forced, badly acted humor filling the screens for more than 60% of the film. These things by themselves are no problem; in fact I and many other fans would embrace them eagerly as part of the magic of Harry Potter, but the problem is that David Yates replaces many major plot points for these things.

Some of this stems from mistakes in the previous films, when the ending of the series was not known, and so cuts were made that seemed innocent at the time, but which ended up being fatal. The thing is, these problems could very easily have been rectified in this film, even if they had to sway away from the book for only a few minutes, and completely new problems arose, that are made quite clear to be important in the seventh book. For example (Spoiler up ahead) in the beginning of the film, no mention is made whatsoever of Harry’s inheritance from Sirius, Kreacher or Grimauld Place. How then, will Kreacher help the three main characters in finding the real Slytherin locket? And where will they stay while they plan the infiltration of the ministry? This is not the only instance like this, there is no mention of Bill and Fleur (where will Harry, Ron and Hermione go after they escape the Malfoy mansion?).

Things like these missing plot points were the downfall of an otherwise very well done film, and because there had been so much hype and excitement over this film, it made it that much more disappointing. The movie focused too much on the things that should have only taken fifteen minutes screen time at most, but which ended up taking at least an hour. The script writers have trapped themselves in a way that limits what they can do in the next film, and I highly doubt that they will have enough material to make two films when they have cut so much of the book out already!

I must say that I left the theatre with a rather heavy sense of disappointment in my stomach, not only was this film ruined, but the next one was too. Characters that were meant to have larger roles in this film have no chance of having large roles in the next film after what they did to them. On top of this, there was no proper sense of loss when one of the key characters died at the end, it was just over and done with in a flash; and with no mention of their burial, another key plot point in the next film has evaporated…

It is not that the elements they have used in this film are bad, it’s just that the required elements were not included, and so the film as a whole fails.

If you are an avid fan of the series, then chances are you have already seen this film, if not then I’d suggest seeing it anyway, if only to pay tribute to JK Rowling and to relive the magic for just a bit longer. It seems that no matter how bad these films get, record breaking money will always be made, I believe the midnight showing gained $22 million; $4 million higher than The Dark Knight, so no matter what the reviews are, in the financial world, this film is a success.

Over all, focus was placed on all the wrong things, pacing was terrible and any true Harry Potter fan will be disappointed, this movie deserves a 5/10.

Reviewed by Josh Bell (8M)

9 thoughts on “Josh Bell’s review of Harry Potter 6 movie

  1. Nice one josh, got some good points there and yeah they have dug themselves a grave by screwing up the movie. Quite honestly the hype about the movie is probablly the only thing that is going to provide for the budget for the next two movies (HP&TDH 1 and 2) so good review and nice wording on your half.

  2. Pingback: Harry Potter kids grow up – LIFE photos « Fiction is like a box of chocolates…

  3. Hi, I thought it was good, but some things were missing yeah and perhaps a little too much focus on teh wrong things, too much loving and such, what happened to that battle at the end!? There was one right? It’s been a while since I’ve read them. But that would have made it more exciting.

    I do however think that, they made almost the right desicion.
    I think they were alright to leave out what they left out and by including it would have brought a little confusion orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr like it’d be irrelevant for the film it’s in. AS in, it’s important later, but could be fixed later easily enough in my opinion.

    Example 1: Inheritence of sirius house and kreacher and such, in the 7th movie it goes like this: Har”sirius left me his house, Let’s go there and hang out?” Herm”Oh harry dear why didn’t you say before!?” Ron”Yeah, bloody hell, that’s brilliant” lloloool Cool.

    Example 2: Bill and Fleurs housemarriedtimes
    Sitting around at the weaslys hang times. Bill and fleur come in or something for a visit in a nice lovely way Ron”billandfleaur got married, did you know?’ Harr”Oh cool”

    Therefore 7th movie is fixed. Hopefully. Please don’t let it fail. Please.

    Oh bye/

  4. Hey Josh,

    A very well written review. I haven’t seen the film yet but Ellen and Ashley saw it twice and loved it. You’ve described how I have always felt about Harry Potter…I’m sure the books are a lot better than the film versions, but the movies usually disappoint for me mostly because of a wrong point of focus and some terrible chemistry among the main cast (and yes, that forced humour, I know exactly what you mean!)

    Sorry you were disappointed, it’s possible the next one(s) will be better but if not, we always still have the Hobbit in 2012…

  5. I appreciate your reservations about the film with respect to changes made to the plot of the book, the compromises in characterization, and the limitations of future film developments. It seems the producers are catering to dollar signs more than the integrity of Rowling’s vision. Thoughtful review!

  6. Wow Josh… what a very eloquent review. Well done. I am actually seeing the movie tomorrow with my 11 yr old daughter and, while I hope it is a great film, I am as concerned as you over the integrity of the story. I have felt that the past five movies have missed quintessential plot points that would be necessary for the finale. And then I think…movies are always different to books. Always have been and always will be. The greatest disappointment in my life was discovering that the “Gone With the Wind” movie didn’t even touch on what was in the actual book. But it is still a great movie.

  7. This is a really thoughtful review, Josh. I have not seen the film yet as I haven’t read the book (have read all the earlier ones) and don’t want to spoil it. Reading your review (skipping bits to avoid spoilers, thanks for the tip) I wonder if I should see the film now while it can’t disappoint. Your analysis of the way the filmmakers have edited the story with an eye for light and funny content whilst neglecting underlying themes is a worry. Thanks for your stimulating review!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s